bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DP67BA
Memory	19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120622
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '20 at 08:13
Run Duration	239 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 205 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 500 56% 438 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3545) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.04% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 3.08 Parallax 1.25 2% 2.28 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 2.22 2% 2.54 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.04% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 236 234 233 232 231 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.3% Above average	Read 247 Write 227 Mixed 222 SusWrite 232 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 24.6 84% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 21.5 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 96.4 74% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 98%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 166GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 92 90 92 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 117 Write 102 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 90.6 69% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 52GB free Firmware: CC4D SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 119 136 121 107 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 126 Write 76.8 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 118 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 112%
JMicron 640GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 172GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.49% Terrible	Read 25 Write 21.5 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 7.7 14% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.49% Great: 62%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 254GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 26.5 Write 22.3 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 7.3 25% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 42%
ST350041 3AS 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 7GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.3 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 26.5 Write 22.5 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 7.4 25% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 6GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.4% Terrible	Read 26 Write 21.8 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 7.3 22% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 6.4% Great: 49%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 296GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.4 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 21.7 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 7.4 24% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.3 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,035x
Core i7-2600Intel $186Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,578x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	939x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,050x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	518x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	378x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	298x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16