Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1804 x 1036 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 23:14
Run Duration335 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980XE-$750
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 241
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 905
80% 679 Pts
64-Core 2,448
152% 2,448 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37B8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
139% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 233
Parallax 250
141% 219 fps
MRender 263
Gravity 230
Splatting 133
163% 208 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 139%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2294 2181 1489 1498 1492 1501 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,016
Write 1,944
Mixed 1,594
SusWrite 1,742
411% 1,824 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 74.8
255% 94.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,077
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 977
722% 956 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 308%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
931GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 464 451 452 450 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 446
Mixed 436
SusWrite 455
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 48
162% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
466GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 446 447 441 442 355 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 435
Mixed 403
SusWrite 429
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 39.9
140% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
WD WD4003FFBX-68MU3 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 231 249 232 246 235 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 138%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
47GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 66 66 67 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 50
Write 32.2
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 66.2
71% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 46%
ST315005 41AS 1.5TB
321GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 66 66 67 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 62.2
Write 60.8
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 66.1
78% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 38%
ST350063 0AS 500GB
34GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 52 52 50 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 71.8
Write 49.2
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 51.6
72% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
WDC WD10 EARX-00N0YB0 1TB
35GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 52 52 49 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 53
Write 50
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 51.3
66% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 44%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
87GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.7 0.8 1 0.8 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 118
Write 74
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 8.4
76% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3333 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 16.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 10.8
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $557
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback