Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 167%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200904
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 16:08
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980XE-$750
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 954
84% 715 Pts
64-Core 2,500
155% 2,500 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37B8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 231
Reflection 213
Parallax 249
188% 231 fps
MRender 268
Gravity 235
Splatting 164
176% 222 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 167%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1654 1428 1410 1394 1380 1334 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,018
Write 1,947
Mixed 1,603
SusWrite 1,433
394% 1,750 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 63.4
228% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,148
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 1,006
749% 999 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 283%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
809GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 465 460 457 457 457 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 456
Mixed 441
SusWrite 462
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 44.9
158% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
463GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 455
Mixed 429
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 46.4
162% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD WD4003FFBX-68MU3 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 184
Write 189
Mixed 89
114% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.8
361% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 138%
ST350063 0AS 500GB
466GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 78 76 78 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 54.7
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 76.7
84% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
WDC WD10 EARX-00N0YB0 1TB
32GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 70.5
Write 71.5
Mixed 44.5
78% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 44%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
523GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 77.5
Mixed 55.5
94% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 77%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
253GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 97.5
Write 52
Mixed 60.5
82% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 46%
ST315005 41AS 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 97.7
Write 93.3
Mixed 50
98% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3333 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.4% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 16.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 10.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $557
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback