bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System
Motherboard	Intel DX58SO
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101214
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '18 at 04:17
Run Duration	550 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 156 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 332 40% 308 Pts	64-Core 311 19% 311 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 36E2) 1GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 22.9 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 20.6 19% 20.3 fps	MRender 25.6 Gravity 24 Splatting 16.8 18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 290GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G37R5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 625 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 657 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 156 (64) Unknown 100 100 2052544 (65) Unknown 100 100 112576 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 11 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 445 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1430 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 45 100 227634774061 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 625 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 625 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 5360 (EA) Unknown 100 100 987 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2477 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2049 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 4378	32.8% Below average	Read 253 Write 132 Mixed 116 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 7.37 47% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 19.5 DQ Write 25 DQ Mixed 24.5 18% 23 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 92%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2TB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 174324656 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 387 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 44070703 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1557 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 369 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032834 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 44 5119148077 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 21 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 694 (C2) HDA temperature 45 56 111669149741 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -92895847643599 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6743469097 (F2) Unknown 100 253 25364184241	84.7% Excellent	Read 103 Write 192 Mixed 120 103% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 5.23 4K Mixed 0.76 211% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 267312 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 852 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 701082 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1411 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 334 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 45 824115245 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2620 (C2) HDA temperature 45 55 107374182445 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 71360881623707 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1138160699 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1141584285	95.6% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 172 Mixed 153 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.17 64% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 211813312 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 940 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2003900 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1558 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 360 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 46 807272492 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3102 (C2) HDA temperature 44 54 103079215148 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 81217831568121 (F1) Unknown 100 253 8389711670 (F2) Unknown 100 253 8398549088	93.3% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 153 Mixed 156 121% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.23 86% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 451GB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 108 (03) Spinup time 118 118 51579585122 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 929 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 34 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 33165 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 383 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 945 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 945 (C2) HDA temperature 130 130 253404577838 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56.4% Above average	Read 112 Write 84.9 Mixed 105 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.39 90% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 68%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 25.7 Mixed 27.6 35% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.3 64% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 539GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 25.7 Mixed 27.9 36% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.25 65% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 40%
TOSHIBA MK5059GSX 500GB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 449GB free, PID 70f1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 28.1 Write 24.3 Mixed 25.1 33% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.16 17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 20%
ST2000VM 003-1CT164 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 350GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.4% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 25.5 Mixed 17.9 30% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.74 4K Mixed 0.15 33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 44%
PI-210 USB 2.0 Drive 320GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 250GB free, PID 0064 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	9.11% Terrible	Read 15.8 Write 15.2 Mixed 8.27 16% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.27 48% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.11% Great: 19%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB 2,689 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 117GB free, PID 1f05 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 25.7 Mixed 26.7 35% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.3 69% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 21%
Seagate Backup+ RD 1TB 295 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 8GB free, PID a013 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 92.8 Write 95.2 Mixed 82.8 116% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.32 74% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.6% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 11.1 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 12.2 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,033x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,576x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	938x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	377x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16