Today's hottest deals
SeagateST3000DM008
Hitachi

Release date: Q3 2016.

  

Release date ≈ Q2 2016.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 114,700 user samples
112,118 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% 2.5TB free
Worst Bench: 60% 1.5TB free
Poor: 60% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 1015
2,582 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% 3TB free
Worst Bench: 49% 902GB free
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 116th / 1015
Effective Speed
Effective HDD Speed
92.1 % Faster effective speed.
+28%
72.2 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
161 MB/s Faster read speed.
+28%
126 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
131 MB/s +2% 128 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
0.69 MB/s 0.88 MB/s Faster random read.
+28%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
1.6 MB/s 2.09 MB/s Much faster random write.
+31%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
76.7 MB/s Slightly faster mixed IO speed.
+6%
72.3 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
0.74 MB/s 0.82 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
+11%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
160 MB/s Faster sustained write speed.
+27%
126 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
202 MB/s Much faster peak read speed.
+30%
155 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
171 MB/s Slightly faster peak write speed.
+10%
156 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
0.8 MB/s 1 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+25%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
1.8 MB/s 2.3 MB/s Faster peak random write.
+28%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
86.9 MB/s 87.6 MB/s +1%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
0.9 MB/s 0.9 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
200 MB/s Faster peak sustained write speed.
+29%
155 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 53,961,714 HDDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.44 % Insanely higher market share.
+4,300%
0.01 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
59 % More popular.
+18%
50 %
Age
Newest
98 Months +4% 102+ Months
Capacity
Capacity
3TB 3TB

The new 3TB Seagate Barracuda 2016 (ST3000DM008) replaces its hugely successful predecessor, the 3TB Barracuda 7200.14 2011 (ST3000DM001). Comparing performance between the two models shows that the newer drive has 12% faster sequential speeds, comparable 4K speeds, improved mixed sequential speed and reduced mixed 4K speed. Overall, the effective speed is 12% faster on the 2016 model. Since there is normally little price difference between the two models the 2016 version is the clear winner especially for use as a backup drive with its impressive sequential read and write speeds of nearly 200 MBps. See the current value leaders here[Feb '17 HDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Hard Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 HDD Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top HDDs. [HDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your HDD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback