Asus P6T SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6T SE  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100308
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 21:01
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 980-$148
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 159
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 486
48% 391 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Gigabyte(1458 4009) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 114
Parallax 127
98% 120 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 112
Splatting 106
106% 134 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
500GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 16 19 24 25 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
30GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 53 87 107 10 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.3% Below average
Read 213
Write 182
Mixed 175
SusWrite 52.5
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 16.4
68% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 20.5
DQ Write 71
DQ Mixed 20.8
23% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
9GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.8 9.5 11 1.7 1.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 565
Write 8
SusWrite 5.8
138% 193 MB/s
4K Read 270
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
11,365% 90.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
27GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 2.7 9.6 8.5 12 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
8.57% Terrible
Read 32.7
Write 14.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 7.7
19% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
57% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.57%
Great: 30%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB
14.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.5 2.8 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 33
Write 27.1
Mixed 27
SusWrite 3.1
28% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.3
272% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 149%
ST10000N M001G-2MW103 10TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.6% Poor
Read 33.5
Write 26.7
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 0.1
27% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.3
269% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 105%
ST18000N M000J-2TV103 18TB
16.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 22 22 22 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 33.2
Write 27.4
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 22.8
37% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.1
240% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $181
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback